Tool Comparison

GauntletCI vs. NDepend

NDepend analyzes your full .NET assembly to enforce architecture rules and track quality metrics over time. GauntletCI analyzes only the lines that changed in a pull request to catch behavioral regressions before they merge. They address different points in the development process.

ToolWhat it checksWhat it misses
NDependArchitecture rules, code quality metrics, technical debt trackingBehavioral change risk, diff-scoped pre-commit detection
GauntletCIChange safety, Behavioral Change Risk in the diff--

What NDepend does best

NDepend is a mature .NET-specific analysis tool focused on architecture governance and code quality metrics. Its dependency matrix and CQLinq query language give teams precise control over layered architecture rules, coupling thresholds, and technical debt tracking across the full assembled codebase.

  • Dependency matrix for visualizing and enforcing layered architecture
  • CQLinq - a LINQ-based query language for writing custom metric-based rules
  • Technical debt time estimates with trend charts across builds
  • Cyclomatic complexity, coupling, cohesion, and other structural metrics
  • Runs 100% locally - no code upload, no SaaS dependency
  • Deep Visual Studio and CI/CD integration for .NET teams

Where GauntletCI differs

GauntletCI does not replace NDepend. It solves a narrower, earlier problem: catching the behavioral regressions and breaking API changes that live in the diff itself, before the code is pushed. It does not scan assemblies or track metrics over time.

Diff-only analysis

GauntletCI only looks at the lines that changed. It never compiles or scans assemblies. This keeps it fast enough to run pre-commit and precise enough to avoid noise from pre-existing issues.

Behavioral risk focus

Rules target behavioral drift: removed null guards, altered exception handling, changed concurrency patterns, dropped public API members. These compile fine but break production behavior.

Free, no license server

GauntletCI is open-source and free. No per-developer license, no activation server, no renewal cycle. Install with a single dotnet tool install command.

Feature comparison

Capability
GauntletCI
NDepend
Diff-scoped analysis (changed lines only)
100% local execution, no code upload
Pre-commit (before push) feedback
Air-gap / data residency friendly
Free tier with full rule set
C#/.NET behavioral rule set
Architecture policy enforcement
Metric-based quality gates (cyclomatic complexity, coupling, etc.)
Technical debt time estimates
GitHub inline PR comments
Baseline delta mode (suppress existing findings)
Local LLM enrichment (no API key)
MCP server (AI assistant integration)
Custom rules via code (no GUI or query language required)
Yes Partial / requires configuration No

When to use each

Scenario
Recommended tool

Enforcing layered architecture and forbidden dependency rules

NDepend's dependency matrix and CQLinq rules are purpose-built for architecture governance.

NDepend

Catching behavioral regressions in a pull request diff

GauntletCI analyzes only the changed lines for removed guards, broken APIs, and altered patterns.

GauntletCI

Pre-commit feedback before a push

Sub-second local diff analysis. NDepend runs a full assembly scan post-build.

GauntletCI

Tracking code quality metrics and technical debt over time

NDepend trend charts, debt estimates, and rule dashboards are designed for this.

NDepend

Air-gapped or strict data-residency environments

Both run locally, but GauntletCI requires no license server or activation.

GauntletCI

Zero-cost adoption with full rule set

GauntletCI is free. NDepend is a commercial license starting at several hundred dollars per developer.

GauntletCI

Custom metric-based rules using query language

CQLinq lets teams write LINQ queries over the codebase graph for custom quality gates.

NDepend

Optional offline AI explanations for findings

Built-in ONNX engine. No API key or cloud call needed.

GauntletCI

Why diff-based analysis matters

NDepend answers: "What is the state of the codebase and how has it trended?" GauntletCI answers: "Did this specific change introduce a behavioral risk?"

The distinction matters at the moment of commit. A developer who just added a CancellationToken parameter to a public interface method does not need a full dependency matrix report - they need to know that the change breaks all existing callers. GauntletCI surfaces that finding in under a second, before the push.

NDepend's strength is longitudinal: tracking how architectural health evolves across dozens of builds and hundreds of contributors. GauntletCI's strength is surgical: catching the single regression in the 20 lines you just wrote.

Using GauntletCI and NDepend together

The tools are complementary. NDepend enforces architecture rules and tracks metric baselines across the full build. GauntletCI enforces behavioral integrity on every diff before it is pushed.

A common setup: GauntletCI runs as a pre-commit hook to catch breaking changes and removed error handling in the diff. NDepend runs in CI to block merges that violate coupling thresholds or introduce architecture violations in the assembled output. Together they provide coverage at both the change level and the codebase level.

Try GauntletCI

Install in under two minutes. No account, no cloud, no configuration required to start.